MPs may potentially discuss Prince Andrew’s behavior, his large mansion, and the potential removal of his dukedom in parliamentary debates.
The Government has declined to allocate time in the House of Commons for MPs to address Andrew’s situation, citing the Royal family’s preference for focusing on more pressing matters.
Nevertheless, there is a possibility that the issue could be raised on days when ministers do not control the parliamentary agenda. A source from the Liberal Democrat party hinted at using one of their opposition days to allow MPs to deliberate on Andrew’s actions.
Reports suggest that the prince is contemplating voluntarily leaving his Royal Lodge residence amid controversy over the nominal rent he pays for the property in Windsor.
Despite efforts to distance himself from past allegations, including renouncing his dukedom before the publication of certain memoirs, Andrew continues to face criticism, particularly regarding his tenure at the Royal Lodge since 2003.
According to parliamentary rules outlined in Erskine May, discussions pertaining to the conduct of the sovereign, the heir to the throne, or other royal family members must be based on a substantive motion to avoid casting reflections during debate.
With the Government hesitant to initiate discussions on Andrew, an opposition day debate could provide MPs with an avenue to express their concerns.
A spokesperson from the Liberal Democrats emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in scrutinizing various aspects related to Prince Andrew, including his residence at the Royal Lodge and his dukedom.
The Liberal Democrats have one opposition day remaining in the current parliamentary session, awaiting a schedule allocation from the government to determine the most significant national interest issue for debate.
The party hopes for proactive involvement from the King in addressing the situation, acknowledging that only an act of Parliament can officially strip Andrew of his Duke of York title.
